America's subject state, or China's subject state- that is the question:


>By - The Washington Times - Friday, August 17, 2007
>The senior Air Force commander in the Pacific this week threw cold water on a Chinese military proposal to divide up the Pacific Ocean into U.S. and Chinese spheres of influence.
>Gen. Paul V. Hester was asked about China¡Çs recent plan to give the United States control of the eastern Pacific region, while China would control the western Pacific.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/aug/17/inside-the-ring-11086842/
>Inside the Ring - Washington Times
Doesn't Nippon Kaigi perform the same part in Japan,
the part which Communist Party of China perform in China?
In other words¡Ä

Is Nippon Kaigi Ž¥Ž¥Ž¥
Japanese version of Communist Party of China!?

A strange expression(¾Ð) d(*¡­£í¡®)¡á£³

http://www.geocities.co.jp/WallStreet/7659/sjp/statements/sjp20161212a.html
>Prevent the next South Korean president become second Duterte¢ö £í(¦µ¦Ø¦µ)¡¿
http://www.geocities.co.jp/WallStreet/7659/sjp/statements/sjp20161101a.pdf
>If Japan remain a Subject State, then Japan will never own Voluntary Constitution, will it? (¡±£ñ¡±)¥À¥é¡¼


/*
This statement is
COPY FREE
MODIFICATION NG
ATTRIBUTION FREE
COMMERCIAL OK
*/
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

[Page Top]
[back]